Op-ed: Downeast LNG Proposal Won’t Hurt Canada

Posted on Dec 12, 2005 in Environmental, Regas Terminals & Capacity, Safety & Security, State and Local Issues | Comments Off

A Robbinston, Maine resident responds to an Nov. 26 op-ed saying that he does not see “any hard evidence” that the proposed Downeast LNG terminal will adversely affect Canada. He says the placement of an LNG facility in the midst of a residential area can be mutually beneficial for the developer and community dwellers and cites the Cove Point, Md., terminal in his argument. See the editorial in Friday’s Bangor Daily News. [Archived articles require a fee.]

Comments are closed.

Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed, affiliated and member firms (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the member firms or their controlled, managed or affiliated entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Unless otherwise indicated, attorneys at Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

Op-ed: Downeast LNG Proposal Won’t Hurt Canada

Popular Posts

Hot Topics